Theory of natural selection vs intelligent

It is a very interesting story about human nature. When the Emperor parades around in clothes that are invisible no one says anything because everybody thinks that if they cannot see the clothes that they are stupid, ignorant, or insane. The farce continues until a child exclaims, "The Emperor has no clothes!

Theory of natural selection vs intelligent

I write off-the-wall fictionand Righteous Seduction concerns next-generation game. My blog concerns "deplorable" politics, game, and my writing projects. The basic idea is that r-selected species are adapted for environments with unlimited resources, while K-selected species are adapted for competition.

The typical examples of these are rabbits and wolves. As the article explains: The virtually unlimited resources are a primary reason why rabbits are not territorial. They have no defense against predators other than running.

They do not have any loyalty towards their group. It makes no sense for a rabbit to rush to the aid of another rabbit being attacked. Because they can be killed so easy, it makes sense to reach maturity as quickly as possible so they can begin birthing children. Hierarchies are pointless in rabbit society.

Rabbits lives are rather simple; eat grass and run away from danger. Hunting requires more intelligence and training than grazing on grass.

Due to the increased difficulty of hunting compared to grazing, more time is invested in training the offspring to survive. Because prey is limited, wolves must viciously protect their territory from intruders.

While it might seem heartless, if another pack is allowed into their territory the supply of prey will be exhausted and both packs will starve to death.

Because raising the offspring is so important for the continuation of the species, the wolves will pair for life in order to raise their young. As such, they will choose the best mate they can find to further improve their chances of birthing strong, healthy cubs.

This process of choosing leads to hierarchies with an alpha male leading the pack. Wolves also wait longer before reproducing and generally have less offspring.

If they reproduced early and often, there would be too many wolves for the ecosystem resulting in the consumption all the prey and starvation. Wolves are more complex. This is true for carnivores in general.

Because carnivores typically live in groups, they must have more sophisticated ways to communicate.

Educational Attainment of Religious Groups by Country

The same is true for their domesticated brethren. Look at a dog and you can easily identify if he is scared, happy, angry, or bored by his body language and barks.

Can you tell the same moods on a rabbit? For example, some herbivores such as bovines will flock in packs and defend themselves. Lions are more K-selected than domestic cats.

The social angle Peacocking works, but be careful not to overdo it. There are individual differences and statistical outliers, of course.

Compare also the factory worker who is a pillar of his community and is proud to bring home the bacon to his wife and kids, versus the starving artist who has yet to produce much of value. Differing societies have their own average balance between r and K selection.

Those mostly r-selected tend to be more collectivist; those more K-selected are generally individualist. This even has implications for mating strategies. After the Sexual Revolution, all the rules changed seemingly overnight, and what used to work became ineffective.

The flowers, gifts, and poetry stuff once showed you were dependable and good-natured, which believe it or not used to be desired qualities. That will get you Friend Zoned now. These days, being at least somewhat game-aware is pretty necessary even to get a steady girlfriend.

Intelligent Design vs. Evolutionary Theory: A Brief Comparison

The political angle The breakdown of the nuclear family explained in one picture. Ideologies tend to support either K-selection or r-selection as a model for society.

Now consider the part quoted about rabbits given above.Essay about Reconciling Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection and Intelligent Design - Natural selection is an important component of evolution.

Natural selection occurs when some members of a population are better fit for survival and reproduction than the others in . Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection Versus Creationism Essay Words 3 Pages My research of Darwinian evolution has led me to believe that there is little room for spirituality of any kind in a truly rigorous scientific theory of the origin of life.

Game Theory (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Natural Selection vs. Intelligent Design Add Remove This content was STOLEN from feelthefish.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here! Scientific Facts Proving Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution is Wrong, False, and Impossible.

Theory of natural selection vs intelligent

News You Can Use. Hi, my name is Evolutionary Fraud from Piltdown, England. large part of the reason why Creationist arguments against evolution can sound so persuasive is because they don't address evolution, but rather argue against a set of misunderstandings that people are right to consider ludicrous.

Nov 08,  · Darwinian evolution – The theory, first articulated by Charles Darwin, that life on Earth has evolved through natural selection, a process through which plants and animals change over time by adapting to their environments.

Natural Selection vs. Intelligent Design